Casio Vintage B650WC-5ADF Rose Gold Digital Dial Rose Gold Stainless Steel Band D200
₹4,495.00
Casio Vintage B650WC-5ADF Rose Gold Digital Dial Rose Gold Stainless Steel Band D200,
- Case / bezel material: Resin::Adjustable Clasp::Vintage Collection::Stainless Steel Band::Resin Glass::Rose Gold ion plated band::50-meter water resistance
,
Specification: Casio Vintage B650WC-5ADF Rose Gold Digital Dial Rose Gold Stainless Steel Band D200
|
12 reviews for Casio Vintage B650WC-5ADF Rose Gold Digital Dial Rose Gold Stainless Steel Band D200
Add a review
₹4,495.00





Sakshi –
Fine quality cz its casio
Ram pande –
Good one
Amazon Customer –
Only thing to keep in mind is that scratches on the wristband leave behind a silver streak which spoil the otherwise perfect rose-gold coloured timepiece.
Gulnaz Khan –
The media could not be loaded.
 I bought this watch after keeping it in my cart for a long time. It’s a beautiful watch suitable for both casual and formal wear. I love it; it’s budget-friendly and lightweight. This is my first Casio Vintage watch, and I like it because it gives a rich look when worn. Go for it!
Gulnaz Khan –
Amazing watch looks elegant , value for money!
Nimz Hera –
Il colore dal vivo è bellissimo
Nikhal A Shahir –
Best product
Good quality
Very nice watch
Dhivya –
I love it
This soy milk is a great source of calcium for those who don’t consume dairy. –
Tudo ok!
This soy milk is a great source of calcium for those who don’t consume dairy. –
I gifted this to my friend and she loved this vintage watch.
Ana P. –
Same as shown. I love it
Zohaib1hassan –
The watch has a nice solid feel It about it. It feels quite heavy and large on my small wrist which is about 55mm across the wrist and 15cm circumference (female). The weight may be reduced by removing some links.
Colour:
Very nice rose-gold, like pale ‘salmon’. I was unable to match the true colour on the photo. Overall, the colour is pleasing.
My verdict:
I was tempted to return the watch because it felt too large and bulky on my small wrist. Yet, after having worn it for a few hours during work, I decided to keep it and I am starting to like the look of the large watch. I also like that the face can be illuminated. For a more elegant look, for ladies with small wrists, I may recommend a smaller watch. I am quite tempted to purchase a smaller, stainless steel, ladies’ watch for a more casual look. I have to say, my CASIO watches have never failed me.
Dimensions, which I may have measured differently to the manufacturer’s:
Stainless watch overall, across wrist, incl. extension for wristband attachments: 40mm
Width along length of wrist: 37mm
Display face: 20mm x 13mm
Size of hour figures: 7mm
Minute figures: 5mm
Date figures: 3mm
Band length with fixed catch: 70mm
Band length with movable catch: 105mm
Band width: 17mm
Links: 6mm
Weight with all band links: about 65g
65g does not appear ‘heavy’, but if one is not used to wearing a stainless-steel watch it ‘feels’ heavy and bulky to start with. The length of the links is ample for a larger wrist. Links may be removed by a service centre which would make the watch less ‘heavy’.
I also purchased the following watch for use on my camping trips: https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B00HFPIIOI?psc=1&ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_product_details This is a replacement for the same watch I’ve had for too many years to remember and which has never failed me (size comparison on photo below). The main reason I purchased a replacement was because the band on my ‘old’ watch broke (most likely material fatigue after years of swimming in chlorinated water, wearing the watch daily and not wiping it every now and then) It was quicker to purchase a new (and very cheap) watch than trying to hunt around for a replacement band.